"What, are you crazy? It’s all about the money.” According to a video secretly recorded by a group called Project Veritas, these are the exact words of a (since-fired) executive at a major publishing company. Is the Common Core all about the money? Marc Aronson responds.
“

What, are you crazy? It’s all about the money.” According to
a video secretly recorded by a group called
Project Veritas, these are the exact words of a (since-fired) executive at a major publishing company, commenting on the Common Core. Asked about the Common Core and publishers, a teacher caught on camera (in the same video) exploded: “
'It's bullshit and the thing is, what they do is... create some new f**king system, that f**king sucks to sell more books and then we have to learn something new with the students.'” Is the executive telling the real truth? Is the teacher justified in her fury? As a nonfiction fan, author, and editor, I have a stake in this. Indeed, I have seen nonfiction sales rise with the Common Core. However, I fell in love with the standards when I first read them, years before they had any impact on royalty statements. And having served recently on the New Jersey team that evaluated that state's English Language Arts (ELA) and Math standards, I can say that the executive is simply wrong–I’ll get to the teacher in a moment. As a team, the New Jersey group carefully examined the standards one by one, grade by grade, and listened to extensive comments from teachers, administrators, parents, professionals, and business leaders. In our months of work, I saw commitment, not greed.
The initial push to examine the Common Core standards in New Jersey came from Governor Chris Christie. As we know, the governor in the midst of a campaign to win the Republican presidential nomination and many of his views are sliding to the right as he courts the party’s base. It would be easy to see his mandate as purely political grandstanding. As it happens, the state was due for a five-year review of its standards, and the process was conducted in a thorough, professional manner. From the first, our guiding principle was this: What will someone awarded a high school diploma be ready for? The group looked at each educational stage and benchmark to consider what students would need to know to be ready for the next step, and the next, so that after graduation they would have the skill set to begin the next phase of their lives. Interestingly, perhaps the most useful comments and suggestions we received were from Amy Rominiecki–immediate past president of the New Jersey Association of School Librarians. Rominiecki mapped out places where the American Association of School Librarians (AASL) standards could enhance and improve the New Jersey standards. We included several of her suggestions in the recommendations we attached to our final report. Standards, of course, are not guarantees. Implementation and instruction must be delivered by skilled educators. Some of you may have reservations about the Common Core, or me, or find the publisher’s cynicism convincing, but what can’t be questioned is the educational imperative to improve students’ post-graduation outcomes. According to the New York Times while high school graduation rates are at an all-time high–more than 80 percent nationally–“The most recent evaluation of 12th graders on a national test of reading and math found that fewer than 40 percent were ready for college level work.” Why is there disjunction between graduation rates and preparation for life? Sure, there is grade inflation and social advancement. I also agree with those who say that the single largest problem with education is economic inequality. If more students had more resources (social, emotional, financial, cultural, and technological), more would be ready to meet the challenges and opportunities that follow after secondary education. Yet, there is a role for standards to play, and as educators and communities who care about our nation’s youth, it is necessary we establish a path that's best for as many students as possible. T
he vow, the pact, we must make in our application of the standards is that students who master the progression of skills we have outlined will indeed be ready for military service, or to find employment, or to continue their education at a technical school, or two- or four-year college. Perhaps some publishing executives do see dollars and cents in all educational decisions. It may be their job to do so. But that does not mean that we all have the same motivation. And while I may be misreading the teacher, her last comment is disturbing. Sure, if teachers are forced to turn their work inside out so publishers can make money, that’s just wrong. But I would think that having to learn something new in order to best help students is the nature of education.
Get Print. Get Digital. Get Both!
Libraries are always evolving. Stay ahead.
Log In.